Archive for costs

What is an “order”

Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 100
  1. In written submissions, the respondent relied squarely upon the judgment of this Court in Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Roslyndale Shipping Pty Ltd. [1] The respondent referred in particular to the statement by Spigelman CJ that “[i]n its natural and ordinary meaning, the word ‘order’ would not encompass a refusal to make an order.” For that proposition, the Chief Justice relied upon the reasoning of Fullagar J in The King v Blakeley; Ex parte the Association of Architects, Engineers, Surveyors and Draftsman of Australia, and of Lord Herschell in Boulter v Kent Justices.

Behaviour at mediation attracting a costs order

COSTS – costs of an abortive mediation – where mediation was court ordered – where the plaintiffs did not attend the mediation – where the plaintiffs did not notify the defendants – costs awarded to the defendants

Read More→

Costs for self represented litigants

Bechara trading as Bechara and Company v Bates [2016] NSWCA 294

On 27 May 2016 the Court dismissed Ms Bechara’s amended summons seeking leave to appeal from a judgment and orders of Adamson J made on 29 October 2015. Ms Bechara was not present at the hearing of the application. The respondent Mr Bates, a barrister, appeared for himself as counsel instructed by solicitors. Mr Bates made an oral application for a gross sum costs order under s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) in respect of a) solicitors’ costs and disbursements excluding counsel’s fees and b) counsel’s fees for professional work performed by Mr Bates himself.

The issue on appeal was whether the Court should make the gross sum costs order sought. This involved consideration of whether the Court could make an order for costs in respect of a self-represented barrister.

Held (Beazley P, Meagher and Payne JJA):

(1) Generally self-represented litigants are unable to claim professional costs. An exception, known as the “Chorley exception”, applies in the case of a litigant in person who is a solicitor: [22]-[27].

London Scottish Benefit Society v Chorley, Crawford and Chester (1884) 13 QBD 872 and Guss v Veenhuizen (1976) 136 CLR 34 applied.

(2) There is no authority of the High Court or an intermediate Court of Appeal as to whether the Chorley exception applies in respect of a self-represented barrister: [30].

(3) In the absence of any submissions put by Ms Bechara she may be taken to have conceded that the Court can make an order for costs in respect of a self-represented barrister: [65]-[70]

Wilkie v Brown [2016] NSWCA 128 applied.

Appointing a tutor and protecting her from a costs order

Read More→

NSW Court of Appeal: appeal books

 

In place of order (5) made on 5 July 2016 (but not entered) the Court makes the following order:

(5)   Order that the appellant’s solicitor –

(a)   not charge his client with more than 50% of the costs and disbursements associated with preparing the Blue appeal books;
(b)   to the extent that such costs or disbursements have already been paid or might be paid in the future, reimburse the client for that amount; and
(c)   give the client written notification of the terms of this order.

Read More→