Skip to content

Rusu was incorrectly decided

Gregg v R [2020] NSWCCA 245 As I have stated, the trial judge also concluded, relying on the decision in Rusu (National Australia Bank Ltd v Rusu (1999) 47 NSWLR 309; [1999] NSWSC 539), that s 48(1) of the Evidence Act merely prescribes the means of adducing evidence of the contents of a document and leaves untouched questions of authenticity. It is not…

Read More
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Scroll To Top