Skip to content

Apprehended bias November 18, 2015

Jensen Laundry Systems Australia Pty Ltd v Raskopoulos [2015] NSWCA 352

22 The question raised by the application for disqualification on the basis of apprehended bias was whether “a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the resolution of the question the judge is required to decide”: Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd v Nicholls [2011] HCA 48; 244 CLR 427 at [31]. As the plurality judgment then observed at [63], it is necessary for the party asking a judge to disqualify him or herself, having identified the conduct said to give rise to the apprehension of bias through pre-judgment, to articulate the connection between that conduct and the possibility of departure from impartial decision-making with respect to the questions to be decided. See also Barakat v Goritsas (No 2) [2012] NSWCA 36 at [12] per Basten JA.

Related Articles:

Appeals – orders not reasons

Review of single appellate judge orders by full court

Solicitor's duty and retainer: extent of duty to advise

Appeal from District Court on seperate determination of liability




Social Media

Subscribe to the weekly newsletter

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
Scroll To Top