Skip to content

Contributory negligence under the CLA December 8, 2016

Accordingly, the existence and extent of a claimant’s contributory negligence is to be assessed by reference to the risk of harm which is the subject of his or her claim for damages, and the precautions that a reasonable person in the claimant’s position would have taken against that risk: Gordon v Truong (2014) 66 MVR 241; [2014] NSWCA 97 at [14] – [15] (Basten JA).


The question of whether a person has been guilty of contributory negligence is to be determined objectively – whether the plaintiff had taken that degree of care for his or her own safety that an ordinary reasonable person would take: Boral Bricks Pty Ltd v Cosmidis (No 2) (2014) NSWLR 393; [2014] NSWCA at 139 at [54] (McColl JA); see also at [94] (Basten JA, Emmett JA agreeing).

Related Articles:

Reopening decisions of the NSW Court of Appeal

Trial judge's duty to give reasons

Personal injuries damages – appeal

State of mind and implied waiver of client legal privilege




Social Media

Subscribe to the weekly newsletter

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :
Scroll To Top