Skip to content

Negligence – need to deal with each suggested precaution by reference to s. 5B(1) July 3, 2018

NEGLIGENCE – occupier’s liability – customer trips and falls in appellant’s premises while entering a children’s play area – play area had raised shock-absorbent surface – primary judge found failure to warn and failure to make surface of play area level with remainder of premises were breaches of duty which caused the injury – findings under ss 5B and 5D of Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) set aside – appeal allowed and judgment entered for appellant

Bunnings Group Ltd v Giudice [2018] NSWCA 144

39. The respondent submitted that shortly afterwards in his Honour’s reasons his Honour turned to s 5B(2), and asked the Court to read the reasons charitably, such that the finding as to s 5B(1)(c) anticipated and took into account what his Honour later found as to s 5B(2). The reasons should be read bearing in mind that they were given orally. However, on a fair reading, the primary judge proceeded on a basis which did not comply with the requirement of s 5B(2) to consider those four matters. There is no suggestion that his Honour was proleptically bringing into play the matters in s 5B(2). Contrary to what he said, it was not “perhaps desirable” to identify those matters “which might be described as precautions” in order to apply s 5B. It was necessary to identify each of them, and to apply s 5B to them. And there is no way in which the reasons may be read to disclose separate attention to s 5B(1)(c) by reference to each individual precaution, rather than collectively.

Related Articles:

Double insurance + other insurance clause

Issue estoppel, res judicata and abuse of process

Communication with the Court

Administrative review

Search

Categories

Tags

Social Media

Subscribe to the weekly newsletter

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.