Skip to content

Vicarious liability March 2, 2017

 

Day v The Ocean Beach Hotel Shellharbour Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 250(2013) 85 NSWLR 335

[31] On my reading, those passages demonstrate that common to one of the lines of reasoning employed by the majority in Oceanic Crest was the proposition of law that once one person was vicariously liable, no other person could be. But even if I be wrong about the proposition forming part of the ratio of the case, it amounts to “long-established authority and seriously considered dicta” of the High Court which should be followed: Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; (2007) 230 CLR 89 at [134] and [147] and see Ying v Song [2009] NSWSC 1344 at [17]-[20] (Ward J).

Related Articles:

Reviewing factual findings on appeal

Leave to appeal

Blameless motor accidents: refusal of leave to re-argue Axiak

Implying law into contracts

Search

Categories

Tags

Social Media

Subscribe to the weekly newsletter

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
Scroll To Top