Skip to content

What is an "order" May 16, 2017

Nash v Silver City Drilling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2017] NSWCA 100
  1. In written submissions, the respondent relied squarely upon the judgment of this Court in Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Roslyndale Shipping Pty Ltd. [1] The respondent referred in particular to the statement by Spigelman CJ that “[i]n its natural and ordinary meaning, the word ‘order’ would not encompass a refusal to make an order.” For that proposition, the Chief Justice relied upon the reasoning of Fullagar J in The King v Blakeley; Ex parte the Association of Architects, Engineers, Surveyors and Draftsman of Australia, and of Lord Herschell in Boulter v Kent Justices.

Related Articles:

The "Ferrcom inference": what it is and is not

Duty of development consent authority

Appellate principles concerning challenges to apportionment; Contract; Indemnity

Availability of cross claims in apportionable claims

Search

Categories

Tags

Social Media

Subscribe to the weekly newsletter

Please enter your name.
Please enter a valid email address.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.