Roche Mining Pty Ltd v Jeffs
in General
This site consists of case excerpts, journal articles and reference sources which have been of relevance to me over my practice as a barrister
-
Roche Mining Pty Ltd v Graeme Wayne Jeffs [2011] NSWCA 184 [77] As to Roche’s contention that the respondent’s experience, training or the obviousness of the risk militated against precautions (other than those in place) being taken, I agree with…
-
Parsons v JJ Richards and Sons Pty Ltd
in NegligenceParsons v JJ Richards and Sons Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 331 Beazley JA [3] In Czatyrko v Edith Cowan University [2005] HCA 14 ; (2005) 214 ALR 349 the High Court reiterated the well-known principles governing an employer’s duty of…
-
Nominal Defendant v Livaja: injury, impairment and incapacity
Nominal Defendant v Livaja [2011] NSWCA 121 [65] There are distinctions to be drawn between injury and impairment or disability consequent upon injury, and between impairment or disability and diminished earning capacity. Because an individual has a physical and mental…
-
Pleading an established duty of care
in Duty of Carehttps://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2026/22.html#_Ref223681247 42. In cases involving an established duty, to plead the existence and scope of the duty it commonly will be sufficient for a plaintiff simply to identify facts showing that each of the plaintiff and defendant fell within the…
-
The function of pleadings
https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/nsw/NSWCA/2026/22.html#_Ref223681247 The pleadings are to contain a summary of the material facts, not the evidence by which those facts are to be proved: UCPR, r 14.7. Material facts should be pleaded, not merely identified in the particulars. Doing so can…
-
Cross-examination on an interlocutory application
Markisic v Commonwealth of Australia [2010] NSWCA 273 32 Whether or not a judge permits cross-examination in an interlocutory proceeding is a matter for that judge’s discretion. An appellate court will only interfere with a discretionary decision if an error…
-
Notices to admit
Gerard Michael Mcguirk v the State of New SouthWales [2009] NSWSC 616 [16] As to paras 1 and 5, Mr Hutchingspointed out that the relationship between the plaintiff and Ms Buchanan andtheir movements on the evening prior to the first arrest are…
-
The s 151Z formula
Synergy Scaffolding Services Pty Ltd v Alelaimat – NSW Caselaw That is, D = T – (C – X), where: D = the sum of damages ultimately recoverable by the plaintiff worker from the third party tortfeasor; T = the sum of…
-
Privilege: Carbone v National Crime Authority
in Evidence[22] Hill J was confronted with a similar question in Carbone v National Crime Authority (1994) 52 FCR 516, and he adopted a robust approach to the answer. He merely said at 529: "In my view there is no substance in…
-
Drawing inferences from the evidence
in Evidence[44] Although the appellant accepted that one witness (ironically one it had called) Mr Ahama, said in cross-examination that the ramp surface was slippery whether wet or dry, it argued that evidence did not establish the surface was unreasonably slippery because…